News

Dear ProLife Colleague The emotional toll that induced abortion takes on the pregnant woman does not end when the abortion is over. In certain way, it only begins, and many women have sadly found the “abortion is forever” —as much at the “experts” would like us to believe otherwise—see https://www.aaplog.org/complications-of-induced-abortion/induced-abortion-and-mental-health/aaplog-response-to-the-apa-task-force-report/ Women are, after all, beautiful […]

Dear ProLife Colleague, You will remember that Dr. Priscilla Coleman’s major metanalysis published in the British Journal of Psychiatry in Sept 2011 was hardly recognized in the media, in spite of being a major article in a major medical journal. (see https://www.aaplog.org/get-involved/letters-to-members/ letters of Sept 1,2,8, and 14 to review). Recently her article received a

Dear ProLife Colleague: Make no mistake: is is NOT about Birth Control. It IS about Government Control. Look at this 2 minute video. Right On. http://aul.org/conscience AAPLOG

Dear ProLife Colleague, The prominent “Original Research” article “The Comparative Safety of Legal Induced Abortion and Childbirth in the United States”, by Raymond and Grimes in the Feb, 2012, journal “Obstetrics & Gynecology,” rehearses the “original mantra” of the choice argument: “Abortion is safer than Childbirth.” To reach this conclusion, Raymond and Grimes employ statistical

Dear ProLife Colleague, President Obama’s accommodation on the contraceptive mandate is an accounting gimmick. The religious institutions still have to fund the “insurance” which buys the abortifacient. But that might not occur to a person who does not understand morally based conscience convictions. God-inspired moral convictions don’t accommodate. So much for religious institutions. But here

Dear ProLife Colleague, To add to your store of info on the Komen/Planned ParentHood funding affair: There was an unparalleled seismic event erupting from prochoicers’ objections to Komen Foundtion’s (now revoked) policy decision to withhold grant money because of congressional investigation into the PPH’s possible unethical modus operandi in certain areas. What incited this immediate

ear ProLife Colleague, You are well aware of the current hassel: Susan Komen Foundation’s gifting Planned Parenthood over half a million dollars a year for performing breast health initiatives (exams, mammograms for the underserved); then Komen pulling this grant as a policy decision because PPH is under investigation by a govt committee; then, when the

Dear ProLife Colleague: 2 letters in 2 days?? The subject matter demands it. The proponents of “abortion is the solution” speak again! According to this “original research” article (“The Comparative Safety of Legal Induced Abortion and Childbirth in the United States”, by Raymond and Grimes, i Feb, 2012 journal “Obstetrics & Gynecology) in a flagship

Dear ProLife Colleague, The prominent “Original Research” article “The Comparative Safety of Legal Induced Abortion and Childbirth in the United States”, by Raymond and Grimes in the Feb, 2012, journal “Obstetrics & Gynecology,” rehearses the “original mantra” of the choice argument: “Abortion is safer than Childbirth.” To reach this conclusion, Raymond and Grimes employ statistical

Dear ProLife Colleague, AAPLOG consists of both Catholic and Protestant members, as well as prolife members of other faiths. We obviously oppose medications that have been demonstrated to have abortifacient action. On matters such as birth control pills and voluntary tubal ligations, we leave the standard to the individual physicians, their conscience, and their faith