News

AAPLOG – AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS Dr. Norman F. Gant Executive Director, ABOG 2915 Vine St. Dallas, TX 75204 April 7, 2008 Dear Dr. Gant, The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists appreciates the recognition the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology has given to the diversity of opinion regarding the […]

Please note that the “the Executive Committee has instructed the Committee on Ethics to hold a special meeting as soon as possible to reevaluate ACOG Committee Opinion #385.” This meeting was held in April, but no action was announced. Noller to Fellows-3-27-08

Response: ABOGDrGant to Leavitt Response3.19.08

Regarding the potential for interaction between ACOG Ethics Opinion #385 and ABOG’s new Maintenance of Certification requirements to eventuate in discrimination against prolife ObGyns. LeavittLettoABOGDrGant3.14.08

AAPLOG – AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE: AAPLOG 339 River Ave, Holland, MI 49423 Website: www.aaplog.org Telephone: (616) 546-2639 E-Mail: prolifeob@aol.com February 6, 2008 AAPLOG RESPONSE TO THE ACOG ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION #385, TITLED “THE LIMITS OFCONSCIENTIOUS REFUSAL IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE” The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), one

Final Version 2007 under the section “Limitation and Revocation of Diplomate Status” the following statement is found: “3.0 Disqualification or Diplomate revocation also may occur whenever:…3.6 the physician shall have violated any of The Ethical Considerations in the Practice of Obstetrics and Gynecology currently published by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and adhered

THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PROLIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS INDUCED ABORTION AND SUBSEQUENT BREAST CANCER RISK 2008 Induced abortion and the subsequent risk of developing Breast Cancer The possibility of this association has been persistently and vigorously attacked and denied by the major medical groups in the country since l994. The ACOG, and the NCI have been particularly

The opinion is accessible as a PDF document: Opinion 385