Pro-Life Advocacy
AAPLOG PRO-LIFE ACTIVISM SINCE 1989
1989 & 1993
The American Association of Pro life Obstetricians and Gynecologists presented its Pro life Award to President Ronald Reagan in 1989 and to Congressman Henry Hyde (R-IL) in 1993 for their efforts in the Pro life arena.
1994
In 1994, AAPLOG surveyed all obstetricians and gynecologists in the United States as to their position on abortion and the stance ACOG has taken on the issue. The results indicated 52% of the respondents opposed abortion on demand (as a form of birth control), and 61% thought ACOG should take a neutral or anti-abortion stance on the issue of abortion.
In 1994, we also opposed an ACOG plan supporting non-physician abortion providers.
1995
In 1995, we were successfully involved with the House Committee on Education Oversight in opposing the 1995 ACGME attempt to mandate that every OB/GYN resident be trained to perform elective abortions, and every training program to provide such training in order to remain accredited. The resulting federal legislation, The Medical Training Nondiscrimination Act of 1995 protects the right of physicians to follow their own conscience on this issue, and rendered the ACGMEâs mandated accreditation requirements practically unenforceable.
1996
In 1996, when ACOG officially opposed federal Partial Birth Abortion (PBA) Ban legislation, we wrote a strong letter of protest to ACOG. We will be glad to send you, on request, a copy of our letter detailing our position and reasoning.
1997
In 1997, we highlighted information regarding the still controversial Abortion-Breast Cancer link. We continue to explore data on this and other abortion complications.
2000
Since the FDA approval of the abortifacient RU 486 (Mifeprex) in late 2000, we have been involved with filing and following up an extensive Citizens Petition challenging the FDAâs flawed approval process. Additionally, we have produced educational literature documenting the lax requirements of care surrounding use relative to the trials used to approve the drug and compared to other countries. We also continue to document and evaluate the reported adverse events and deaths associated with Mifeprex use.
2003
Since the 2003 FDA hearing on possible OTC approval of Plan B for emergency contraception we have strongly opposed this approval on solid medical grounds. ACOG leadership has been a very committed supporter of OTC approval. We have written letters of objection to both ACOG and the FDA. In November, 2005, in cooperation with several other concerned groups, we submitted extensive legal and medical comments to the FDA opposing OTC status for Plan B or other emergency contraceptives.
2004
Since 2004, we have encouraged members to write letters of support to their legislators to ban human cloning and embryonic stem cell research.
In 2004 and 2005, we have been actively involved defending our beliefs in Court: in the New Hampshire Parental Consent Case, the Washington euthanasia case, and challenges to the Weldon amendment in Washington DC and California. The Weldon Amendment is a 2004 law that protects the conscience rights of health care providers by denying federal money to institutions or organizations that require health care providers to perform or to refer patients to other providers for an abortion procedure.
2005
In a direct assault on the Weldon Amendment, in August, 2005, the President of ACOG, in a letter to U.S. Senators requested that Federal legislation be changed so that doctors with a moral objection to abortion be required to refer the patient asking for abortion to a doctor who will do the procedure. AAPLOG vigorously objected to this attempt to use federal legislation to force pro-life doctors to violate their conscience by requiring them to be complicit in the abortion procedure in this way. We sent with a strong letter of protest to every state, district, and national officer of ACOG (for whom we could find an address) detailing our objections.
2006
In 2006, AAPLOG participated in the development and submission of an amicus curiae in support of the Partial Birth Abortion ban.
2007
In April, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in favor of the constitutionality of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban. In October, 2007, AAPLOG participated in the International âWomen Deliverâ conference in London, and added our voice to those objecting to universal solution for high maternal mortality rates in underdeveloped countries.
In October, 2007, the ACOG âEthics Committeeâ issued Opinion #385, entitled âThe limits of Conscientious Refusal in Reproductive Medicine,â stating that physicians have an ethical obligation to either do or to refer patients for abortion, should the patient so request. AAPLOG vigorously opposed this Opinion, and asked ACOG to reconsider and rescind Opinion #385.
2008
In January, 2008, ABOG announced certain changes in the Maintenance of Certification requirements.: Part 1 of the new 4 part MOC process requires that one must satisfy ACOG Ethics requirements, to wit, âmust adhere to ethical standards outlined by ACOG and sanctioned by ABOG.â AAPLOG is asking for clarification, since as the wording of Opinion #385 and MOC part I currently exist, there is the potential for a physician refusing to refer for abortion to be denied recertification. Feb 2009 Update: The 2009 ABOG Maintenance of Certification requirements changed the language so there is no reference to the ACOG Ethics standards. This satisfies AAPLOGâs request for clarification and alleviates concerns expressed earlier in this paragraph.
In August, 2008, the U.S. Dept of HHS announced proposed new regulations that would update and strengthen legislation passed since the 1970âs whose purpose is to protect the conscience rights of healthcare providers. AAPLOG is strongly supporting these proposed new regulations.
In August, 2008, the American Psychological Association accepted a report by its Task Force on Abortion and Mental Health. AAPLOG strongly objects to what we consider the heavily unbalanced treatment of the scientific literature, with exclusion of much of the literature which is, in our opinion, biased in favor of the conclusion. We have sent a letter of protest to the APA.
In September, 2008, AAPLOG participated in the Presidentâs Council on Bio-ethics, which examined the issues surrounding ACOG Ethics Committee Opinion #385. AAPLOG will continue to be the voice for Obstetricians and Gynecologists who have chosen to stand for the right to life of the unborn, for an honest and open discussion within the medical profession regarding the long term complications of abortion, and for the rights of women considering abortion to be given adequate âinformed consentâ information regarding the procedure.
2009
In March 2009, AAPLOG participated with a coalition of prolife organizations to develop Freedom2Care.org, a website initiative focused on the necessity of the physicianâs right of conscience in medical decision making. The first project was to rally support for the new HHS Consicence Regulation, (which protects healthcare workersâ right of conscience) as the new administration threatens to rescind the new regulation.